Benutzer Diskussion:Hajo Keffer/2014

De Interpretatione

(84.100.243.186 09:57, 3. Jan. 2014 (CET))Dear Sir, a first remark: I read German very well. So, if you want to write something for me, you can do it in German. I've made factual discoveries about On Interpretation, chapter 7. The text is particularly important because it is at the origin of the square of opposition. For this reason, I think that my papers published in French reviews with "comité de lecture" should be inserted in the Literatur of the article. I invite you to click on the following links:

KNOLmnc 1 The Arab handing down of Aristotle to the Christian West. A discovery about On Interpretation, second book of Aristotle’s Organon.

x KNOLmnc 1 A German exception: the translation of On Interpretation by Professor Gohlke. His tenth note on indeterminate propositions KNOLmnc 1 Quatre articles de JF Monteil sur le Peri Hermeneias signalés par Raoul Corazzon dans Bibliography on Aristotle’s De interpretatione x KNOLmnc 1 Jacques Brunschwig apprécie les articles sur Aristote et Maïmonide. Hermann Weidemann. http://mindnewcontinent.wordpress.com/

Dear Sir, I surely don't want to deny that you've made an important contribution to the research on "De Interpretatione". However, there are some rules in the German Wikipedia concerning the bibliographical recommendations which are given at the end of an article about a certain topic. These rules are laid down in WP:LIT. They basically state that only literature should be recommended that presents an overview over the whole topic that is covered in the article. The reason behind that rule is that the bibliography is mostly aimed at non-experts and that a bibliography that is too extensive becomes useless for non-experts. This is why I removed your citations: They are too specific, i.e. they do not cover the whole topic of the article, but only a certain aspect of it. Hence they contradict the rules of WP:LIT. But again, this is not supposed to imply anything negative about the quality of the articles. Best wishes --Hajo Keffer (Diskussion) 11:02, 3. Jan. 2014 (CET)

Vielen Dank. I see your point. I have some reasons to think that my papers allow to establish -at last- the text of Die Hermeneutik and are therefore of a crucial importance for understanding the whole of the work. But we have plenty of time ahead. For the moment,I quite willingly submit to your decision. I should be glad if this exchange of somewhat divergent opinions might be the beginning of a fruitful and friendly contact. This is my e-mail adress: jean-francois.monteil@neuf.fr. I suggest you take cognizance of my research areas by typing KNOLmnc 0 Sites and topics and KNOLmnc Liste et classification des knol(s)mnc. My discoveries about Aristotle and Maimonides are based on my use of German scholarship as well as on my knowledge of Arabic. Tchüss. Jean-François Monteil http://mindnewcontinent.wordpress.com/

Kompaktheit (Logik)

Hallo, der Artikel wurde auf dem Mathematik-Portal zur Löschung vorgeschlagen, es fehlen Belege für den Inhalt. Ggf. (das wäre bei passenden Beleegn zu diskutieren) könnten Teile in Kompaktheitssatz (Logik) eingearbeitet werden.--Kamsa Hapnida (Diskussion) 14:25, 2. Nov. 2014 (CET)