Diskussion:Matthäus Adriani

Another source

My German is far from being perfect, I don't understand many parts of Your article, but I feel that Your article is a bit to... literal. My source seems to suggest that Adrianus is not necessarily very trustworthy or, speaking more stricly, at least some of the theses that in this article are presented as sure, are in reality testified only in the words of Adrianus himself. For example, theses that he was the teacher of Reuchlin and Pellicanus and that he was a doctor of medicine are testified only in his letter to Johann Ammerbach. The letter to Ammerbach is certainly a kind of recommendation, moreover, we can think that one can find in it some typical renaissance emphasis or boasting. I think that the reader shuldn't have an impression, that these theses are something sure. So please compare my source: A ery interesting biographical dictionary of the contemporaries of Erasmus. Laforgue 20:17, 25. Jul. 2009 (CEST)