Diskussion:499 (Film)

Erwähnung des Magischen Realismus

Moin, sowohl die verlinkte Filmkritik von Film Threat (499 is very documentary-esque, though, with its magical realism framing device, I hesitate to call it one officially. ), als auch das Tribeca Festival (Director Rodrigo Reyes combines documentary and a bit of fiction, using magical realism to draw a parallel between the apocalyptic sacking of Tenochtitlan and the harsh reality of many modern-day Mexicans.) erwähnen den Magischen Realismus im Zusammenhang mit dem Film. Weitere Erwähnungen bei

• 812filmReviews: (It’s a rare thing to find a film that is so brilliantly artistic that it’s challenging to look at as simply film at all, but more as a moving painting, a living work of art, the closest thing to every tenant of magical realism brought to life)
• Modern Times Review: (Doubtlessly, 499 is a documentary, what we usually label as «non-fiction». Despite this, Rodrigo Reyes adds, in an anachronistic game of magical realism, the fictional element: the ghost.)
• DocsBarcelona: (The power of magic realism offers an imaginative way to heal the traumas of a past marked by abuse of power and oppression.)
• Montreal International Documentary Festival: (In this bold dystopian film, part reality and part magic realism, Rodrigo Reyes invokes the ghosts of modern Mexico: forgotten people, families victimized by ubiquitous violence, hordes of migrants…)
• International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam: (And despite the beautifully composed images of this original, magical-realistic road movie, a harsh reality predominates.)
• und weitere.

Ich denke das sollte ergänzt werden. An welcher Stelle? Vorschläge/Formulierungen? --Abu-Dun (Diskussion) 15:59, 19. Jul. 2021 (CEST)