Diskussion:Designgeschichte
Letzter Kommentar: vor 1 Jahr von IBits in Abschnitt Designgeschichte = Design Studies?
Designgeschichte = Design Studies?[Quelltext bearbeiten]
"But we are not a discipline, nor should we be one, despite our proto-theory, scholarly materials, or university courses. We need to be inclusive, not exclusive; we will need new skills and insights as our current inquiries change." Robert Kates, "The Great Questions of Science and Society Do Not Fit Neatly into Single Disciplines" The Chronicle of Higher Education, Section 2 (May 17, 1989)
zitiert aus: Design History or Design Studies: Subject Matter and Methods, Author: Victor Margolin [en] Source: Design Issues , Spring, 1995, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 4-15 Published by: The MIT Press, Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1511610 siehe auch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_studies --IBits (Diskussion) 17:44, 9. Nov. 2022 (CET)