Diskussion:Travnik
Entschuldigung aber mein Deutsch is leider nicht so gut, so i will write in English if i may. If have a remark regarding the use of photo in this article. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to put a picture of the castle of Travnik, a symbol that doensn't represent a religion. It seems to me, that the autor of this article forgot the fact that 30% to 40% of the population of Travnik was/is Christian, so i would advise you to put a picture that is more neutral than this. Never forget that the Christian population of Travnik was forced out of the city during the latest war, so it could be offending to see the same symbol of there misery, as the symbol of their city.
You can take Berlin as a example. Imagine somebody put's a picture of a Mosque on the wikipedia article of Berlin, simply because Berlin is full of Turks and moslems in generally. (nicht signierter Beitrag von 81.83.224.239 (Diskussion | Beiträge) 00:55, 18. Jul 2009 (CEST))
- The mosque and Sahat kula are an example for the history of the city - yes, the Ottoman one. So the comparison with Berlin doesnt work really well. The picture doesnt stand for "the Islam", but for the centre of Travnik. If you have better ones, you can add them. But not out of the reason of "neutrality". I guess, thats not, what your intention is. -- j.budissin+/- 01:29, 18. Jul. 2009 (CEST)
Defekte Weblinks[Quelltext bearbeiten]
| Die folgenden Weblinks wurden von einem Bot („GiftBot“) als nicht erreichbar erkannt. |
|---|
|
- http://www.bhas.ba/arhiva/census1991/Nac_Sast%20po%20naseljenim%20mjestima.pdf
- Vielleicht ist eine archivierte Version geeignet: archive.org
- Im Jahr 2012 bereits defekt gewesen.
- http://www.leipzig.de/de/business/wistandort/international/partnerst/travnik/
- Vielleicht ist eine archivierte Version geeignet: archive.org