Benutzer Diskussion:Shipspilot

Your Edits

Please stop changing references on articles with "politic high explosive" content without commenting why (see [1]). It also might be appropriate to have a look at (the en Version of) WP:POV. --Valentim 16:10, 1. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

Hello Shipspilot, nice that you have chosen to edit the german project of Wikipedia. But sometimes it seems for me, that you need some explaination when to edit what in a proper way. For example: Your changings here [2] might have been made in good intuition. But 1. almost every reference given in an article stands there to confirm some content there. 2. Wikipedia is no reference-collection (see also WP:WWNI, point 7.3). If you need help, there are people who can guide you (see Wikipedia:Mentorenprogramm). Yours sincerely Valentim 16:53, 1. Aug. 2008 (CEST) 申し訳ないがそれは外部リンク編集を邪魔するほどのどんな理由もなりませんShipspilot 17:05, 1. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

I'm sorry, as I told you twice, I do not understand.

Anyway, because of your repeated, in my mind violating actions I'm going to report that incident (see Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung#Liancourt-Felsen_.28erl..29). I'm sorry to proceed in such a "harsh" way, but I don't see any alternative. --Valentim 17:21, 1. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

Stop!

If you don't stop spamming, you'll be stopped soon, I suppose --Koenraad ^Diskussion 18:26, 1. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

OK. i stop it. because new user can't report to admin notice board. so, this is only way(write in each admin's talk page) to seek help from admin. sorry to bother you.Shipspilot 18:31, 1. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

Es gibt die Diskussionsseite. Es grüßt --Koenraad ^Diskussion 18:54, 1. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

---

Hello, adminstrator, i appreciate your effort. I need some help. Recently, Liancourt-Felsen article reverted by Valentim[3]. This user try to block any edit in Liancourt-Felsen article. i can't understand why?

but he is not a admin of Liancourt-Felsen. he is not adamin, but actling like a admin. i don't understand. i can't report his behavior to vandalism report page. also i can't write to any admin notice board! (because i am a newbie)

because, new user can't report at there. but his reverting reason is totally groundless.

• 1. that article is not protected.
• 2. any wikipedia guide line that "don't input external links"?
• 3. any wikipedia guideline that 'Country name alphabetical order before Local name"?

According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names) [4] says,

Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted and should be listed in alphabetic order of their respective languages, i.e., (Armenian name1, Belarusian name2, Czech name3). or (ar: name1, be: name2, cs: name3). As an exception to alphabetical order, the local official name should be listed before other alternate names if it differs from a widely accepted English name.

He says, 'We must keep Country name alphabetical order before Local name order!"

But, i never heard these things before. there is no rules that 'Country name alphabetical order before Local name order" i just normaly edit and it is not a conetent change. i don't understand why he try to block edit? Liancourt-Felsen article is not under his rule.

Admin, check this case by Wikipedia guideline.

On the contrary, user Valentim[5] violate wikipedia rule. please check this case by wikipedia guideline. Who's claim is right to wikipedia guidelne?

and i must say this, Liancourt-Felsen artilce's external links is not fair. Liancourt-Felsen's Weblinks are 9. but Pro Japan site(japanes goverment .jp) liks are 7. '

7 from 9!!!'

THIS IS NOT FAIR.

for WP:NPOV, this is not a good edit. According to WP:NPOV says,

NPOV requires views to be represented without bias.

but user Valentim try to block withouy any justifiable reason. Admin, I need help. Please check this case.

and please, revert this to right edit.[6] Shipspilot 18:32, 1. Aug. 2008 (CEST)