Diskussion:PeerJ

Relevance

I learned about this entry and became interested because the journal is based in two cities, including, near where I am, San Francisco. Its competitor is PLoS and in the grand scheme of things, the entry, I believe, has relevance and will have increasing relevance over time because open source scientific publishing is gaining traction and considered a wave of the future so that data is shared more thoroughly and rapidly, accelerating research and discovery. Open source publishing ties a little bit to the concept of a collaboratory, in which experimental data are shared for analysis.

I would vote to not delete the entry. If the discussion on that topic is occurring somewhere else, I apologize and permit anyone to copy over these comments to the right location.

Negarc (Diskussion) 02:59, 6. Mai 2014 (CEST)

AW: 您好Negarc，我覺得你在這裡是錯誤的語言編輯的版本。也許你會更好地運用討論的一側在英語語言的項目？問候 --H7 (Diskussion) 08:08, 6. Mai 2014 (CEST)